![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Who', I again?
Mar. 20th, 2006 10:46 pmWell whilst relationships in my life are calm, there is always something i feel compelled to complain about. I dunno if the end of April is an occurance at the moment, things with Michaels company is still up in the air, but I am patient and will wait.
I read my friends Sexualities essay and whilst I am now running for the hills in terms of all the references (and thus the damn reading). All I cangathe from it is that I too am a 'post-modernist'. And here goes why i get to this point.
I believe in fluidity of sexual preference, taking it to another degree I don't like the terminology of homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual etc, these would be because they are labels and boxes and as we all know no one fits precisely into boxes and that road therefore leads to complete and utter insanity as people fight and squeeze metaphorically into boxes to please everyone but themselves.
So here is my theory.
There are two streams of sexuality Sexual and Asexual. I base this on some people Do not feel sexual attraction and others do. Each stream has attractions to whomever, same sex both sexes either sex but the difference is whether it is sexual or not. I also believe that they are an interconnect in that either stream can become each other. I think the terms that we use to define our orientations are applicable to the attractions we have whether Sexual or Asexual. However a better term to define ourselves would be Multi-sexual, there are in my honest opinion time when we maybe orientated differently to what we are at this pointin time.
This thought sort of reminds me of relativity, being that what ever you are observing is relative to your position in the universe, but which changes when you change your position.
I was talking about relativity today with one of my Australian friends She was remarking how if you ask a man is light linear, he (if he is idiot enough to) will answer yes. But under einsteinian relativity it is postulated that it is all relative to the position you are in the gravity with which you view light an time and the list may continue growing.
In other news the pay dispute that my teachers are embarking on. I am now worried and this link is the why;
http://www.natfhe.org.uk/?&id=hepay200607
If i can not progress from one module (also known as unit) I don't pass the year, I may be forced to drop out because not passing thhe year forces me to repeat and to my knowledge my LEA will not pay my tuition fees for industrial action! A final addendum is this is a national strike, and we don't operate on a creite system, the only fucking country that doesn't!!!
For those who are interested, everything with me and mike is going swimmingly. No problems forseeable.
I read my friends Sexualities essay and whilst I am now running for the hills in terms of all the references (and thus the damn reading). All I cangathe from it is that I too am a 'post-modernist'. And here goes why i get to this point.
I believe in fluidity of sexual preference, taking it to another degree I don't like the terminology of homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual etc, these would be because they are labels and boxes and as we all know no one fits precisely into boxes and that road therefore leads to complete and utter insanity as people fight and squeeze metaphorically into boxes to please everyone but themselves.
So here is my theory.
There are two streams of sexuality Sexual and Asexual. I base this on some people Do not feel sexual attraction and others do. Each stream has attractions to whomever, same sex both sexes either sex but the difference is whether it is sexual or not. I also believe that they are an interconnect in that either stream can become each other. I think the terms that we use to define our orientations are applicable to the attractions we have whether Sexual or Asexual. However a better term to define ourselves would be Multi-sexual, there are in my honest opinion time when we maybe orientated differently to what we are at this pointin time.
This thought sort of reminds me of relativity, being that what ever you are observing is relative to your position in the universe, but which changes when you change your position.
I was talking about relativity today with one of my Australian friends She was remarking how if you ask a man is light linear, he (if he is idiot enough to) will answer yes. But under einsteinian relativity it is postulated that it is all relative to the position you are in the gravity with which you view light an time and the list may continue growing.
In other news the pay dispute that my teachers are embarking on. I am now worried and this link is the why;
http://www.natfhe.org.uk/?&id=hepay200607
If i can not progress from one module (also known as unit) I don't pass the year, I may be forced to drop out because not passing thhe year forces me to repeat and to my knowledge my LEA will not pay my tuition fees for industrial action! A final addendum is this is a national strike, and we don't operate on a creite system, the only fucking country that doesn't!!!
For those who are interested, everything with me and mike is going swimmingly. No problems forseeable.
